91¾«Æ· had intended to consider Contact's second ground of appeal, if Vector had reasonably withheld consent, in a 'merits review'. However, due to divided submissions on whether 91¾«Æ· could or should consider Contact's second ground of appeal 91¾«Æ·'s Final Recommendation invited the VTC participants to resolve the issues regarding the VTC drafting as it affects ground two. In the event that the parties reach a view that the VTC provides for appeal ground 2 then the matter should be referred back to 91¾«Æ·.