91¾«Æ·

91¾«Æ· had intended to consider Contact's second ground of appeal, if Vector had reasonably withheld consent, in a 'merits review'. However, due to divided submissions on whether 91¾«Æ· could or should consider Contact's second ground of appeal 91¾«Æ·'s Final Recommendation invited the VTC participants to resolve the issues regarding the VTC drafting as it affects ground two. In the event that the parties reach a view that the VTC provides for appeal ground 2 then the matter should be referred back to 91¾«Æ·.

Related Information

Background
Draft Recommendation
Final Recommendation

Related documents

  • 91¾«Æ· MoU with Vector - October 2008
    1.6 MB Adobe Acrobat PDF file
  • Final Recommendation - August 2013
    328 KB Adobe Acrobat PDF file
Last updated: 27/06/2025, 7:41 pm

Stay in touch

Keep up to date with our latest news and analysis by subscribing to our regular newsletter